
|

The students left at 12:30 promising to return. That afternoon,
February 2, the Record published the first account of the sit-in,
a one-column story with photographs. The next morning, the more
conservative Daily News took an angle more appealing to its white
readers. The incident was relegated to the middle of the "local" section
and indicated that the dean of men at A&T was looking into the possibility
of the misbehavior of students at the Woolworth store. In fact, Dean William
H. Gamble had stated that there was nothing he could or would do as long as the
students broke no laws, a tacit approval of the action of the students and their
nonviolent technique.
By Wednesday,
February 3, the protest was no longer confined to the students
at A&T. Before lunchtime, women from Bennett College and,
for the first time, blacks who were not students arrived to
take part. Also a number of whites joined the demonstration,
especially co-eds from the North Carolina University system’s
Woman’s College. Many others, however, came to
heckle and taunt the demonstrators. So many joined the protesters
that the movement spread to the S. H. Kress lunch counter less
than one half block away. As more black protesters and their
supporters arrived, so did more whites, mostly young, to try
and counter the sit-in efforts. Over the next two days the
numbers continued to grow and racial tensions mounted. Fortunately,
cooler heads prevailed on both sides; negotiations began and
while little progress was made, violence was avoided.
|
|